Jubilee, 1935-style
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d517/4d5173438530cf332d348b56c6df1ac24dbfa293" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74a0a/74a0a189c9bd548871522c189387b501e17c4797" alt=""
Working on a craft magazine, it's impossible to avoid mention of this year's Diamond Jubilee, and in truth I'm very much enjoying it all, to the point where I want to buy a souvenir for myself, something like a mug or a glass. I thought while I'm busy I'd share with you a couple of pics from The Story of Twenty Five Years, a book published in 1935 to celebrate King George V's Silver Jubilee.
I very much like the comparisons between 1910 and 1935. I can't help feeling that those 25 years were much more momentous than our own past 25, but then we haven't had a hideous war ravaging most of Europe; however in terms of communication things have probably advanced every bit as quickly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d50f9/d50f9e12d67a1439fb22487c7bed4547e320dd0f" alt=""
This is a largely frivolous blog, so I shall share largely frivolous pictures: bathing suit styles from 1910 and 1934, and a fashion plate which states, "FRILLS AND FLOUNCES dating back to Victorian days are "modernised" for garden party wear in 1934." I suppose there's a hint of the 1880s in that dress, but just a hint. About as close to Victorian as most modern '1940s-influenced' fashions are to the real styles of the 1940s, I guess!
This is a great thought, love how different the bathing suits are, and I'm wondering if any ladies had worn both styles! X
ReplyDeleteLovely. I do like that flouncy dress, how utterly OTT and romantic!
ReplyDeleteI think I'd definitely suit one of the bathing suits at the top better!
ReplyDeleteThe ruffly dress is very pretty. I sometimes forget just how much puff and ruffle and frill the 1930s had. I think I prefer the streamlined 20s looks or 1930s daywear on the whole. There was no decade in the 20th century quite as ruffly as the 30s.